Hi Fam, I'm seeking some feedback and beta users for my upcoming marketplace site. Our concept is to connect executives (decision-makers) with users who are interested in booking meetings with them and compensating them for their time. Typically, these executives are the ones who frequently get pitched by sales reps and agencies for their product or services. The idea behind our platform is simple - executives voluntarily create a profile and get paid for their time. This way, it’s much easier for sales reps to directly connect with qualified executives, instead of having to send countless cold emails, ignored Linkedin pitches, and cold calls. This not only saves them time and effort but also ensures that the executives they connect with are genuinely interested in hearing their pitches. To kickstart our platform, we're offering the first 200 signups of executives a special incentive - they won't be charged any commission by us when users book meetings with them for for the first 2 months and after that you still keep 75%. If you're an executive or decision-maker interested in joining our platform, please give it a try here. If you want to learn more, here is the webpage.

Love this concept! Happy to to share a couple initial reactions. As a brand and web designer these comments are mostly focused in that area. • I noticed a typo in your subhead. I think it should read “Fozzie is your lead gen…” but it’s missing the

r

on

you

• The button text is wrapping at smaller breakpoints (see screenshot) both in the header and in your CTA. They also get pretty far apart on desktop, and I think it would be stronger to have the primary and secondary interact more like a lockup • The color used for the Gist chat bot feels like it’s not consistent with the rest of the page branding. What if you used the primary iris color used for your logo and CTAs? • I’d love to see a bit more in your header visually about what the product is. It’s a bit underutilized at the moment and I think would help drive your offering home more immediately. • The logo feels like it’s not of the same personality as the typography used for the headers. I’d love to feel a consistent experience when looking at the offering. They don’t have to match, and contrast is good, but they just feel like they are in opposition. • I’d also recommend a pass at the typesetting (body copy predominantly), as it feels a touch hard to read for me. Because it’s pretty copy-heavy, I find myself skimming over it. I think if you opened up the leading bit more, swapped to a regular weight, and reduced the line length (especially on large desktop monitors) it would help improve legibility. • The shadows also are reading a touch muddy to me. An increase in blur and a reduction in opacity I think would help it feel lighter and cleaner. Just my two cents and a quick impression so take what you think is applicable and ignore what you don’t (of course)

thanks @Amy Devereux for all the suggestion. passing to my design team.